Search Weather News:
- May 25, 2015
- May 20, 2015
- May 19, 2015
- May 19, 2015
- May 19, 2015
- May 18, 2015
- May 18, 2015
- May 18, 2015
- May 17, 2015
- May 15, 2015
- May 13, 2015
- May 13, 2015
- May 12, 2015
- May 12, 2015
- May 11, 2015
- May 11, 2015
- May 10, 2015
- May 8, 2015
- May 7, 2015
- May 6, 2015
Too Cool for Severe (Friday El Reno tornado upgraded to EF-5 with 296 mph winds – 2.6 miles wide – biggest ever observed)
Second Deadly Tornado That Hit Oklahoma Upgraded To Rare EF5; 2.6 Mile Width Widest Ever Recorded. Here’s a clip from a Star Tribune summary: “…The update means the Oklahoma City area has seen two of the extremely rare EF5 tornadoes in only 11 days. The other hit Moore, a city about 25 miles away from El Reno, on May 20, killing 24 people and causing widespread damage. But Friday’s massive tornado avoided the highly populated areas near and around Oklahoma City, and forecasters said that likely saved lives. When the winds were at their most powerful, no structures were nearby, said Rick Smith, chief warning coordination meteorologist for the weather service’s office in Norman. “Any house would have been completely swept clean on the foundation. That’s just my speculation,” Smith said. “We’re looking at extremes … in the rare EF5 category. This in the super rare category because we don’t deal with things like this often…”
Photo credit above: “A storm develops just before it produced a tornado near El Reno Okla. just south of Interstate 40 on Friday May 31, 2013. Several tornadoes in the area caused damage and injuries.” Photo: Chris Machian, ASSOCIATED PRESS.
El Reno EF-5: A Game-Changing Tornado? I can’t remember a tornado that had the entire nation talking, arguing and debating. Friday night’s monster multi-vortex tornado threw a spotlight on local TV meteorologists, and the words they choose to communicate risk. Is there ever a good time to encourage viewers to leave their homes and hit the streets? Probably not. And the 296 mph estimated wind speed came not from tracking damage and debris, but from a local Doppler radar on the scene. I’ve never heard of an EF-estimate based on Doppler vs. damage. Today’s edition ofClimate Matters focuses on the El Reno tornado, and the mechanics and physics behind tornadogenesis.
El Reno – Union City Tornado Widest On Record. More remarkable details, maps and videos focused on Friday evening’s monster from kfor.com; here’s an excerpt: “The National Weather Service has just upgraded the May 31 El Reno, Union City tornado to an EF-5 with a width of 2.6 miles wide, making it the widest tornado ever documented. EF-5 is the highest possible rating for tornadoes on the Enhanced Fujita scale. The upgrade was based on information from OU RaxPol Doppler data or mobile radar data, that measured low level winds of 296 miles per hour. The National Weather Service said some of the subvortices had a forward movement of up to 180 miles per hour. This tornado is double the width of the May 20 tornado in Moore, Oklahoma.The F-4 Wilber-Hallam, Nebraska, tornado May 22, 2004 was the previous record holder for the widest tornado on record at 2.5 miles wide…”
PUBLIC INFORMATION STATEMENT NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE NORMAN OK 1206 PM CDT TUE JUN 4 2013 ...UPDATE ON MAY 31 EL RENO TORNADO... METEOROLOGISTS WITH THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE AND RESEARCHERS FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA CONTINUE TO INVESTIGATE INFORMATION RELATED TO THE MAY 31 EL RENO TORNADO. WITH THIS INVESTIGATION... THE TORNADO HAS BEEN UPGRADED TO AN EF5 TORNADO BASED ON VELOCITY DATA FROM THE RESEARCH MOBILE RADAR DATA FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA RAXPOL RADAR. IN ADDITION... THE WIDTH OF TORNADO WAS MEASURED BY THE MOBILE RADAR DATA TO BE 2.6 MILES AFTER THE TORNADO PASSED EAST OF US HIGHWAY 81 SOUTH OF EL RENO. THIS WIDTH IS THE WIDTH OF THE TORNADO ITSELF AND DOES NOT INCLUDE THE DAMAGING STRAIGHT-LINE WINDS NEAR THE TORNADO AS DETERMINED BY THE HIGH-RESOLUTION MOBILE RADAR DATA. THE 2.6 MILE TORNADO PATH WIDTH IS BELIEVED TO BE THE WIDEST TORNADO ON RECORD IN THE UNITED STATES. .EL RENO TORNADO RATING: EF5 PATH LENGTH /STATUTE/: 16.2 MILES PATH WIDTH /MAXIMUM/: 2.6 MILES FATALITIES: N/A INJURIES: N/A START DATE: MAY 31 2013 START TIME: 6:03 PM CDT START LOCATION: 8.3 WSW OF EL RENO /CANADIAN COUNTY /OK NEAR COURTNEY ROAD ABOUT 1 MILE NORTH OF REUTER ROAD START LAT/LON: 35.495 / -98.095 END DATE: MAY 31 2013 END TIME: 6:43 PM CDT END LOCATION: 6.2 ESE OF EL RENO /CANADIAN COUNTY /OK NEAR INTERSTATE 40 AND BANNER ROAD END LAT/LON: 35.502 / -97.848
Oklahoma Storms: Amateur Storm Chaser Took Photo Of Tornado That Killed Him. Morbid? Yes, but everyone needs to grasp the inherent dangers of chasing tornadoes. Here’s an excerpt from newsok.com: “From his pickup, amateur storm chaser Richard Charles Henderson took a cellphone photo of the first tornado Friday and excitedly sent it to a friend. Minutes later, that tornado would kill him. “That was the end of his life right there,” said the friend, George “Sonny” Slay. “He said, ‘I’m having fun,’” Slay recalled Monday. “He told me he was riding around … chasing the storms …. I said, ‘You better quit that!’ “And, then, I guess he was en route to the position that he got in because he said, ‘There goes Channel 9!’ He said, ‘You might even see me on TV.’ And, then a few seconds later, he said, ‘Oop, there’s Channel 5!‘”
Photo credit above: “Amateur tornado chaser Richard Charles Henderson sent this cellphone photo of a tornado to a friend minutes before the tornado killed him. The friend, George “Sonny” Slay, provided the photo to The Oklahoman.”
“Get As Low As You Can And Put As Many Walls As You Can Between You And The Tornado.” Possibly the best advice anyone can give in the wake of two EF-5 tornadoes in 11 days in Oklahoma. Here’s an excerpt from a great Harold Brooks NSSL guest post at Living In The Real World: “…Occasionally, someone strays from this basic messaging, potentially causing problems. Many in the tornado safety community are concerned about an inappropriate message that seems to have become very popular recently, but that differs significantly from the basic safety idea. Some broadcast meteorologists have offered the advice that “if you don’t get underground, you won’t survive.” Sometimes, it’s couched in terms of “this tornado is so severe, the usual advice doesn’t work” or “you can’t survive an EF5 above ground.” The message suggests that even in-residence shelters built to the design specifications of the Texas Tech wind engineering groups and the FEMA standards won’t survive. This advice is wrong and providing it is irresponsible at best, and dangerous at worst. As a factual statement, claiming that EF5 tornadoes can’t be survived above ground is wrong. After the 3 May 1999 tornado that hit Moore, Oklahoma, survey work indicated that 1% of people who were in houses that were rated F4 or F5 were killed, as reported by Hammer and Schmidlin…”
Photo credit above: “People arrived at Fred and JoAnn Horn’s home to help in their salvage efforts, Saturday, June 1, 2013 in El Reno, Okla. . He is a retired state trooper and now serves as a deputy for the Canadian County Sheriff’s Department. Their home was heavily damaged in Friday night’s tornado. More than two dozen family members, church friends and neighbors came to the Horn’s home to help recover items that can be saved.” (AP Photo/The Oklahoman, Jim Beckel)
RaXPol: Doppler Envy. I’d love to mount one of these on the top of my truck – not sure my wife would approve. Here’s an excerpt of a fascinating post (and video) from Robin Tanamachi attornatrix.net: “…One might expect the entire truck to wobble with a giant antenna swinging around on its bed. The engineers addressed that issue from the design stages. As can be seen in the video clip, the entire truck remains surprisingly static, even without the hydraulic levelers deployed. Seasick crew members will not be an issue. And as for the problem of “beam-smearing” (insufficient dwell time) that might result from such a rapidly rotating antenna, the engineers implemented a multi-frequency Tx/Rx system. Conventional Doppler radar transmits pulses a single frequency, then “listens” for the echo of the transmitted signal. Imagine someone striking a single piano key, then listening for the echo of that note. In contrast, RaXPol transmits consecutive pulses at slightly different frequencies, then listens for the returned signal from all of them simultaneously. In the piano analogy, instead of striking only one key, you would sweep your fingers over several keys, then listen for the combined echoes of all the different notes. Dr. Andy Pazmany explains in this presentation how this “frequency hopping” technique works…”
How Storm Chasers Have Made Tornado Alley Safer. I have no beef with storm chasers – they provide the “ground truth” that Doppler radar doesn’t. They’ve saved countless lives in recent decades and contributed to a large and growing body of science. It’s just gotten a little out of control, to the point where there are SO MANY chasers that it makes it safe for everyone, with traffic snarls that can make it dangerous, even deadly for everyone else. There’s no easy answer here, but at least people are talking about this. In the end I hope cooler heads and reason will prevail. Here’s an excerpt of a post from Andrew Revkin at The New York Times: “Here’s a “Your Dot” contribution exploring the surprising mix of factors — including data gathered by storm-chasing scientists — that have steadily made America’s tornado hot zone a safer place, despite the meteorological hazards that are a fact of life there. The piece, building on the discussion that has followed the deaths of three storm chasers in a powerful Oklahoma tornado last Friday, is written by Mike Smith, an entrepreneurial (and blogging) meteorologist focused on extreme weather. Smith is also the author of “Warnings: The True Story of How Science Tamed the Weather,” an engaging history of how individuals fought institutional inertia to improve severe-weather warnings…”
Image credit above: “This May 21, 2013 file aerial photo shows the remains of houses in Moore, Okla., following a tornado the May 20, 2013 tornado. The Oklahoma City area has seen two of the extremely rare EF5 tornadoes in only 11 days. The tornado that hit El Reno had a record-breaking width of 2.6 miles. The one in Moore, a city about 25 miles away from El Reno, killed 24 people and caused widespread damage.” (AP Photo/Kim Johnson Flodin, File)
Storm Chasers: Rapidly Moving Targets. Here’s a remarkable YouTube clip showing the relative motion of the El Reno EF-5 with storm chasers nearby – trying to stay out of the direct path. As the tornado occluded and weakened it veered to the left (northeast), catching some offguard with tragic consequences. When you watch the animation it looks like a potentially deadly game of Frogger. Here’s an explanation: An animation showing the approximate location of the El Reno tornado, with chaser positions overlayed. Tornado path and size based on radar and path compiled by NWS. Chaser positions from Spotter Network.”
Perspective. A 2+ mile wide tornado is unimaginable, but MAPfrappe.com has a tool that lets one superimpose a tornado track on any metro area. Sometimes people don’t get the message until/unless they see it in the perspective of their hometown. The El Reno EF-5 would have touched down near Wayzata, destroying major portions of Minnetonka, Hopkins, the Inner Lakes and South Minneapolis before occluding and dying out over downtown Minneapolis.
Tornado Spike. After a very slow start to the 2013 tornado season a persistent southward dip to the jet stream has created a sudden flurry of tornadoes, with a disproportionate number of violent, EF-3+ tornadoes in the last 2 weeks. Graph: NOAA SPC.
Wednesday Severe Threat. NOAA SPC shows a 10% chance of (significant) severe storms in the hatched area over the Texas Panhandle, an enhanced risk of tornadoes and large hail. A slight severe risk extrends from Amarillo to Oklahoma City, Tulsa and Little Rock.
Disorganized, But Potentially Potent. Whether the tropical wave in the eastern Gulf of Mexico reaches tropical storm status is academic; the real concern here is not storm surge or coastal inundation but inland flooding, from Wednesday night into Thursday across Florida, where some 4-8″ rainfall amounts are likely, due to the slow forward motion of this system.
Moderate Flood Potential. A huge sweep of the east coast, from Sarasota and Tampa to Charleston, Savannah and much of New England may pick up enough rain for flash flooding from the tropical wave pushing across the Gulf of Mexico. Some models print out 3-5″ rains for New York City, Boston and much of interior New England, possibly enough rain to send some streams and smaller rivers out of their banks. Urban flooding is most likely Friday evening into Saturday from New York north and east. QPF courtesy of NOAA.
Alerts Broadcaster Models. Our in-house modeling expert is most concerned about Tampa/St. Pete, in terms of flash flood potential, with some 5-8″ rainfall amounts from today into early Friday.
Track. It’s a little early to be tracking tropical systems, and my sense is that it’s a precursor to a very busy year for hurricanes and tropical storms in the Atlantic, Caribbean and Gulf. Remember, a storm doesn’t have to be a hurricane to be dangerous. In recent years as many as 1 in 3 deaths have come from inland flooding, hundreds of miles from the coast, in some cases 1-3 days after landfall. This danger is often overlooked and underestimated. In many cases the speed of the system is a much better indicator of flood risk than the intensity (category) as it reaches the coast.
Flood Watch. NOAA has already dropped a Flash Flood Watch in place from Fort Myers and Naples to Sarasota and the Tampa/St. Petersburg market. I expect a significant flood risk farther inland as well, from Orlando to Ocala and Gainesville by late Thursday. Expect this watch to be upgraded to Flood Warnings for specific counties as early as Thursday morning.
Rough Seas. Seas up to 10 feet are expected by Thursday in the Gulf of Mexico, the best chance of a 3 foot-plus storm surge from Tampa northward to Florida’s Big Bend. Graphic: NOAA.
Minor Coastal Flooding. High tide at Clearwater Beach, Florida is 10:38 am Thursday morning, so there will be some astronomical forcing to go with any wind-whipped storm surge pushing ashore. Storm surge models bring a 3 foot swell into Clearwater Beach during the late morning hours Thursday. Facilities that are susceptible to flooding (urban, small stream or coastal) may experience problems along Florida’s Gulf Coast, especially Thursday morning and midday.
Copious Rains. Some of the models we trust print out as much as 4-7″ rain from Marco Island and Naples to Tampa; that’s 5-6 week’s worth of rain, falling on ground already partially saturated. I do expect considerable inland flooding over Florida from Thursday into Friday.
Rainfall Risk. The east coast of Florida (Miami and Ft. Lauderdale to Daytona Beach and Jacksonville) will be brushed by this system, with scattered thunderstorms, downpours, even a few isolated tornadoes from feeder bands into this tropical swirl. The greatest risk of rainfall heavy enough to spark significant flooding is along Florida’s Gulf Coast, from Ft. Myers to Pensacola. Farther inland as much as 2-3″ rain may soak Atlanta (minor to moderate flash flooding), with heavier amounts over the Appalachians – as much as 4-6″ from near Chattanooga into West Virginia by Friday. Flash flooding, mudslides and power outages are expected, especially over hilly terrain well inland.
Growing Flood Threat Northeast. The map above shows predicted rainfall amounts by Friday evening. The height of the storm comes Friday night into Saturday from New York to Hartford, Providence and Boston, where some 2-4″ rainfall totals are possible from this tropical system. But the risk extends inland, from Altoona and Harrisburg to State College and Wilkes-Barre/Scranton, where flash flooding may unfold as well from Friday PM into Saturday, lingering into Sunday from Boston to Portland, Maine.
Severe Storms Bring More “Weather Whiplash” to U.S. From flood to drought, back to flood, with a few EF-5 tornadoes thrown in for good measure. Residents of Oklahoma must be both traumatized and confused. Meteorologist Andrew Freedman has the story at Climate Central; here’s a clip: “…The extreme swings in precipitation may be connected, in part, to climate change, since the atmosphere is now carrying more moisture than it used to due to warming air and ocean temperatures. Climate studies have projected that precipitation extremes will become more frequent and severe, and some studies have already found an increase in heavy precipitation events across the Northern Hemisphere and in North America, including in the Midwest. Other studies have found that climate change is increasing the odds for certain extreme rainfall and flooding events…”
Floods Bring Misery To Central Europe. CNN has more details on historic flooding underway in Europe, the result of incessant rains from very slow-moving storms; here’s an excerpt: “Rising rivers menaced swaths of Germany, the Czech Republic and Austria Tuesday, as floodwaters inundated historic cities and forced mass evacuations of low-lying areas. The floods are feared to be the worst since 2002, when parts of Germany and the Czech Republic were devastated and communities in Austria, Slovakia, Russia and Romania were affected. Seven deaths have been reported in the Czech Republic, while southern and eastern areas of Germany, including Bavaria and Saxony, are also badly impacted by recent heavy rains. Images from Passau, a city in southern Bavaria where the Danube River is joined by two other rivers, show dirty brown water running through the streets of the historic old town after water levels passed a 500-year-old record…”
Photo credit above: “Rudolf (11) crosses the flooded market place of the city of Wehlen at river Elbe, Germany, Tuesday, June 4, 2013. After heavy rainfalls, swollen rivers flooded areas in Germany, Austria , Switzerland and Czech Republic.” (AP Photo/Markus Schreiber)
Cartoon courtesy of The Washington Post’s Tom Toles.
“There Have Been Just As Many Scientific Papers Predicting Cooling As Warming!” Wrong. Here’s an excerpt from Skeptical Science: “It is a recurring myth that global warming has stoppedand the Earth has begun to cool. This graphic summarizes data that refutes a related myth that publications now supporting the scientific consensus that the world is warming due to increased carbon dioxide were predicting in the 1970s that the world would cool. A survey of peer-reviewed scientific papers from 1965 to 1979 by Peterson et al. (2008) shows that few papers predicted global cooling (7 in total), while significantly more papers (42 in total) predicted global warming. (Also see the original figure from the paper)…”
Will ExxonMobile Adapt To Climate Change? Not Likely. Triple Pundit’s headline, not mine. Personally, I hope to be pleasantly surprised. Here’s an excerpt of their post: “…Owen then issued her call to action: “As I cast my votes this year, I hope that more shareholders will get involved to move ExxonMobil toward a life-sustaining future. ExxonMobil’s $44.9 billion in earnings for 2012 came close to a world’s record. Instead of wildcatting in costly, unproven non-conventional fossil fuel technologies such as fracking and tar sands that add greenhouse gases to the atmosphere, the company could show foresight and leadership by investing in clean, renewable energy such as wind, solar and geo-thermal.” So what happened at the May 29 shareholder meeting with regard to Owen’s pleas? Not much, except for obfuscation and gobbledygook from ExxonMobil Chairman and CEO Rex Tillerson. Here’s a sampling of what he said, taken from the transcript of the meeting: “I think our views on climate change and the risk of climate change have been fairly well described both in public forums where I and others have spoken as well as in publications in the ways we have expressed view climate change as a serious issue, it does present serious risk. I will maintain the view that I have had for some time now, but notwithstanding all the advancements that have been made in gathering more data, instrumenting the planet so that we understand how climate conditions on the planet are changing, notwithstanding all that data, our ability to project with any degree of certainty the future is continuing to be very limited.…”